Monday, September 24, 2012
Monday, September 17, 2012
Data driven decisions - TLI and The Assessment Wall
Goza Middle School Principal Angela Garner explains the
arrangement of color coded cards on "The Wall" as they relate
to student test scores during September's instructional
leadership team meeting.
|
What happens after the test ends, the pencils are down and the students breathe a sigh of relief? For students in Arkadelphia Public Schools, the end of a TLI test marks the beginning of a comprehensive examination of every test question and every test answer.
Do you ever wonder where test result data goes after it is
delivered to schools? How is that data used? Does it impact the way teachers
teach and classrooms are operated? Or does it sit on a shelf or in a closet? In
Arkadelphia Public Schools, that data becomes the driving force behind almost
every instructional decision, guiding teachers to adjust their classrooms to
fit the needs of every student.
Every year for The Learning
Institute tests’, the district invests a lot of resources, the staff spends
a lot of time organizing, and teachers spend a lot of time preparing the students,
who spend a lot of time testing. This produces a lot of valuable information
that teachers can use to determine what is working and what is not. TLI testing
dates average twice a month from September to April, so a school with more than
450 students, such as Goza Middle School, is analyzing about 7,200 individual test
results in a school year. How does a school manage so much information?
Enter “The Wall.”
“The Wall” is the instructional facilitator’s war room. This
is where test data becomes a visual aid and the results are tracked
test-to-test and year-to-year for every single student in both math and
literacy. Trends in individual student, and overall school, performance are
easily appreciated once the color coded cards, which show a combination of
scores and demographic information, are arranged on white boards on the walls
of the instructional facilitator’s room. TLI test are administered multiple
times a month throughout the school year and the trends in progress can be seen
just days after the test is given. A room is set aside on each campus in the
district to house the assessment wall. Access to the room is restricted to
faculty and staff since the information on display is confidential.
“The cards are placed to show the most current round of
scores,” GMS’s instructional facilitator Joan Crowder said. “Every time the
students test and the results come back, the cards are rearranged.”
The APSD September Instructional Leadership Team meeting was
held on GMS’s campus and led by school Principal Angela Garner. School
principals and instructional facilitators were joined by members of the
administration at the meeting to share ideas about increasing student
achievement and utilizing test data to provide unique student guidance. Garner
and Crowder’s presentation explained the ways their TLI data becomes a critical
role in GMS’s classrooms.
“This (the assessment wall) shows the facts, the numbers,”
Garner said. “There’s not any getting around it. The teachers meet in here and
look at where their students are and they are able to see the results for
themselves. This allows us to translate test data into individual student
success. We see where we might need to push a student harder or provide an
intervention to get one on the right track. The teachers that buy-in see
positive results.”
District-wide, TLI data keeps students, as well as faculty,
on track to reach their greatest potential.
“The information we get from TLI interim assessments and the
data walls being used on each campus allow our teachers and principals to make
very specific, targeted instructional decisions based on the needs of
individual students,” APSD Director of Curriculum and Instruction Jeanette Turner
said. “We strongly believe in the power of data-driven decision making.”
Because of the focus on student-specific results, school
faculty can tell what kind of misconceptions a student may have based on the
wrong answer choices they make on a TLI test. For example, if a student
adds “47 + 15” and incorrectly selects “52” as the answer and that student is consistently making
the same mistake, then it can be assumed the student understands the concept of
addition, but he or she is forgetting to “carry” or regroup. The teacher
would then work with that student individually to correct that specific
misconception instead of unnecessarily spending valuable class time re-teaching
multi-digit addition to the entire class.
The end goal is
student success. TLI tests and “The Wall” are another set of tools in the
educator’s quiver.
“With these tests, practice is harder than the game,” Garner
said. “Often students will take the state (Benchmark) test, after testing with
TLI throughout the year, and say that the state test was easy.”
By Sean Ruggles, APSD Director of Communications
sean.ruggles@arkadelphiaschools.org